Comments on: How To Define Influence In Social Media

By: Hollis Tibbetts

Hollis Tibbetts — Mon, 10 Jun 2013 19:17:47 +0000

solid post! measuring influence is increasingly critical for anyone (or any business) trying to manage their social media interactions.

By: Miriam Slozberg (@msmir)

Miriam Slozberg (@msmir) — Mon, 10 Jun 2013 17:45:57 +0000

Influence is definitely based on context and trust

By: Stephanie

Stephanie — Mon, 10 Jun 2013 11:22:11 +0000

Very nice!

By: shakthi2013

shakthi2013 — Mon, 10 Jun 2013 04:21:22 +0000

The ideas are clear and well articulated. A useful read!

By: X

Mon, 10 Jun 2013 02:20:12 +0000

Very interesting post!

By: Darren Wall

Darren Wall — Sun, 09 Jun 2013 16:43:27 +0000

I always like to read the opinions of others, it can be an eye opener in many ways. This article has made me think about my messages and interactions with my followers in a more logical manner!

By: Patricia Weber (@patweber)

Patricia Weber (@patweber) — Sun, 09 Jun 2013 15:53:25 +0000

Thanks for the 9 indicators of influence here. I see some of them overlapping and – influencing another. For example, doesn’t expertise “influence” resonance? If you didn’t have some authority in your messages, then ideas might not resonate.

Excellent ideas.

By: Bobby Lundmark

Bobby Lundmark — Sun, 09 Jun 2013 15:21:40 +0000

It’s an interesting topic as I see many websites trying to “rate” one or more of the categories listed above. Seems like we are always trying to automate a scale where an automated scale cannot really tell influence beyond “really influential” and “no influence” Anything in the middle seems to be blurry by the automated standard thus increasing the “manipulation” category above the “influence” category

By: alex van pelter (@alexvanpelter)

alex van pelter (@alexvanpelter) — Sun, 09 Jun 2013 13:16:54 +0000

good work – and a critical topic for getting audience engagement done effectively.

By: Dirk

Dirk — Sun, 09 Jun 2013 10:51:39 +0000

Very good article and great topic.