A Workaround for the LinkedIn Invitation Character Limit – Use the Outlook Toolbar

LinkedIn Invitation Text Limit Workaround - Use the LinkedIn Microsoft Outlook Toolbar

Image via Wikipedia

I recently wrote about LinkedIn’s new restriction on invitation text.  What I didn’t realize at the time but has become clear is that there is now a 200-character limit on the text you include with your invitation.  That is not a lot of text to play around with.  In fact, the first two sentences of this blog post are a combined 200+ characters.  For a social networking site that is trying to foster “trusted relationships” amongst professionals, forcing everyone to send very brief and therefore impersonal invitations seems extremely contradictory to me.

Whatever new restriction LinkedIn throws at me I deal with.  This one is no exception.  But there are the disgruntled as well as the pioneers out there looking for a potential workaround.  And I credit the constant reader of this blog and fellow LinkedIn Expert Mark Williams with proposing a workaround which we just confirmed this morning worked.

I will first warn you that this workaround to the LinkedIn invitation character limit requires you to:

  1. Use the Outlook toolbar for LinkedIn, and
  2. You need to first have received an email from someone so that their email address populates the Outlook database

But if you use Outlook and want to invite people from your Outlook address book, I have proof from Mark’s invitation that you can clearly go over the 200-character limit.  For those who want to write longer invitations, your work is cut out for you…until LinkedIn reads this and modifies their APIs to disallow this!

If you have found any other workarounds for this please let us know!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

If you enjoyed this article, sign up for my newsletter and get FREE chapters from Neal's Books!

  • http://www.facebook.com/Andrew.S.Baker Andrew S. Baker

    LinkedIn is going to be a victim of its own success soon, if they don't get it together. There are so many viable professional networks to choose from, and there is very little in the way of first mover advantage at this point. And there are enough people using social networking, that they could lose their base in a matter of months.

    2010 will be the year they make it really big, or marginalize themselves. We'll have to see.

    -ASB: http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker
    Providing Competitive Advantage through Effective IT Leadership

  • http://windmillnetworking.com/ nealschaffer

    Agree with you 100% Andrew. That being said, because LinkedIn is the destination for recruiters and thus jobseekers, it will take awhile for the competition to dethrone them…

  • Pingback: Windmill Networking

  • Pingback: Lissa Duty

  • Pingback: Diana Wei

  • Pingback: angelambrown

  • callthatgirl

    Here is a workaround and I what I actually do often. I have their email, I send them a message in an email and then write them a short LinkedIn invite via the Outlook tool. Why is this? Because more people read email than check their LinkedIn messsages. Email is the best way to contact any business professional. I never use LinkedIn to “do business”. I use it as a tool for my business.

  • http://windmillnetworking.com/ nealschaffer

    Excellent point Lisa. Of course, this assumes that if you already have their email address. If you are looking to create a relationship with someone on LinkedIn where you don't have their email address and would like to go into a litlle more detail on why the invitation, the Outolook Tool Bar is a great approach.

  • callthatgirl

    If you are using the Outlook toolbar, you have their address so it makes my point very valid. Email the person and tell them you will invite them with a short message on LinkedIn and a longer email explaining your relationship needs, etc.

  • http://windmillnetworking.com/ nealschaffer

    Of course Lisa. Thank you for the clarification and reminder…I edited my previous comment so as not to create any confusion on the subject. But what you suggest is definitely a solid addition to anyone's best practices of using Linkedin. Thank you for your contribution!

  • scottwoodard

    Neal…Once again, LI seems to be its own worse enemy. They continue to throw up roadblocks to the most effective use of what appears to be a useful tool. The irony is they often backtrack on initial policies once enough noise is created. I agree with Andrew's comment that sooner or later they will marginalize themselvers if they don't get their act together.
    ~ Scott

  • http://windmillnetworking.com/ nealschaffer

    Indeed…their only hope is to keep growing their membership numbers and increasing revenues, which they are doing an excellent job at…

  • Pingback: Patty Farmer

  • Pingback: Phil Lauterjung

  • http://feigenson.us/blog Walter Feigenson

    This is another stupid move by LinkedIn, and it's so typical of insular market leaders. Their message to their users seems clear: we really don't value you. Their “solutions” seem designed simply to make their business easier or less expensive. And they never tell you what they're doing or when it becomes effective (or for how long, since everything there seems like a moving target). LinkedIn – if you're listening – alienating users is not a good strategy. There are many dead companies we can all point to that did this. If you piss off your users, they are very happy to go somewhere else when there's an opportunity.

    The LI limitation that still pains me the most is not being able to put links in your invitation. This even forces me (sometimes) to have to camouflage my email address – simply to make it easier to have a conversation with the invitee outside LI. Dumb.

  • http://windmillnetworking.com/ nealschaffer

    I agree that LinkedIn is, for whatever reason, taking an insular approach that doesn't make sense and is almost contradictory in terms of what they want to achieve with the site. LinkedIn has added and tweaked things that have been favorably received (applications, new search engine, contacts tagging, etc.) but there are many other things they have done which have only aggravated its users. Not a good business model if you ask me…

  • http://windmillnetworking.com/ nealschaffer

    I agree that LinkedIn is, for whatever reason, taking an insular approach that doesn't make sense and is almost contradictory in terms of what they want to achieve with the site. LinkedIn has added and tweaked things that have been favorably received (applications, new search engine, contacts tagging, etc.) but there are many other things they have done which have only aggravated its users. Not a good business model if you ask me…

  • http://windmillnetworking.com/ nealschaffer

    I agree that LinkedIn is, for whatever reason, taking an insular approach that doesn't make sense and is almost contradictory in terms of what they want to achieve with the site. LinkedIn has added and tweaked things that have been favorably received (applications, new search engine, contacts tagging, etc.) but there are many other things they have done which have only aggravated its users. Not a good business model if you ask me…

  • Pingback: John Curran

Windmills Marketing, 14271 Jeffrey Rd., Suite 177, Irvine, CA 92620 | (888) 541-3429 | info@windmillnetworking.com