Home / LinkedIn / 25 LinkedIn Etiquette Tips to Ponder – Revisiting “What is Your Favorite LinkedIn Pet Peeve?”

25 LinkedIn Etiquette Tips to Ponder – Revisiting “What is Your Favorite LinkedIn Pet Peeve?”

Mind Your Manners by Claire Wallace (1953)
Image by Ann Douglas via Flickr

We need to start watching our manners on LinkedIn.  There are a lot of people who are clearly irritated by the actions of some of us LinkedIn users.  You may not be guilty of “poor etiquette,” but keep reading to make sure!

A few months ago I blogged about what my favorite LinkedIn pet peeves were.  The post received its fair share of comments, but more than that it created a series of conversations on the LinkedIn Group “Executive Suite”‘s Discussion Board that are still continuing to this day.  Not only did people touch upon lots of different pet peeves, but it also raises a general question as to what the proper etiquette should be for engaging with others on LinkedIn or any other social networking site.  I have blogged a lot about different types of LinkedIn etiquette (check out my post on Group etiquette as well as Answers etiquette) and have sprinkled more advice throughout my LinkedIn book, but I wanted to thank the people who provided me with their comments by organizing this blog post from the ideas generated by the community who responded to my question.  Although not intending to be a crowdsourcing experiment, they do offer a blueprint to reflect upon proper LinkedIn etiquette.

25 LinkedIn Etiquette Tips to Ponder

LINKEDIN RECOMMENDATIONS

1) Asking for a recommendation from someone that you do not personally know nor have never worked together with.

2) People getting from/giving recommendations to family members to boost up their numbers.

3) People who, after giving them a recommendation, won’t respond to your request for one.

4) Someone asking for a recommendation out of the blue despite being out of contact for several years.

LINKEDIN INVITATIONS

5) Receiving Invitations from strangers without a personalized text or reason to connect.

6) Cold-calling salespeople who send you Invitations.

LINKEDIN MESSAGES

7) Spam.  One person remarked, “The amount of SPAM I am receiving is drowning out the quality discussions and information others have taken the time to post here. I have stopped receiving most updates from groups and cancelled membership in others that are filled with it.”  Others brought up spam in messages such as “connect with me at Spammer@Spammer.inc,” “I am selling the absolute ground floor ponzi scheme opportunity,” “I need a job. Email me at lazy@desperate.org.”

8) Being added to a mailing list simply because you are connected.

9) People that don’t respond after contacting them.

LINKEDIN STATUS UPDATES

10) People who use their Status Update to “tweet.” (“There is Twitter for that!”)

LINKEDIN INTRODUCTIONS

11) Recruiters who WANT Introductions but don’t GIVE Introductions, joining a Social Network yet choosing not to be sociable.

LINKEDIN ANSWERS

12) “Banal questions that are more like ice breakers at a social event : How do you define success ? What do you love about LinkedIn ? What do you hate about LinkedIn ? Do you tweet ?”

13) People who post a question and then answer their own question with their advertising.

LINKEDIN GROUPS

14) LinkedIn Group Discussion Board Spam. “There should be more active moderation of ALL groups, such spam should be deleted, and users who abuse their membership should be blocked/banned.”

15) “Hardcore, unsophisticated sales pitches in the group discussion or status sections.”

16) “Rock fights in open forums. If you have an issue with somebody, take it outside then throw down.”

17) Job advertisements not posted on the LinkedIn Group Jobs boards.

18) Members of LinkedIn Groups who clearly don’t belong in the groups.

19) People “who join Groups solely to self promote, never exchanging ideas or contributing, but putting up messages that plug whatever crap they’re pimping.”

20) Posting a link on the Groups Discussions Boards in the headline instead of the text area.  Links put in the headline cannot be directly clicked and it forces the reader to cut and paste the URL into their browser.

21) People whose comments on Discussions or Questions have very little value.

22) People that post “Please hire me” on Group Discussion Boards.

23) Jobs or comments posted in Groups without indication of what city/country they are located in.

24) Group spam, despite the fact that settings were supposed to prevent that from happening.

25) Responses to posts that have no relation to the Group Discussion or Question.

The below Pet Peeves were not necessarily related to social networking etiquette and were more general complaints about LinkedIn:

I believe that this is a pretty exhaustive list, but did we miss any?  Please let us know!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • dianawei
    LINKEDIN INTRODUCTIONS
    11) Recruiters who WANT Introductions but don’t GIVE Introductions, joining a Social Network yet choosing not to be sociable.
    (How about non recruiters and just people in general that want an introduction. Those that don't know you well enough or care to even be courteous about asking or learning about you.......yup, think I found my linkedin pet peeve - very pushy strangers putting me in awkward situations. That and strangers who seem too nice to be true, help in disguise - they want you to sign up for their $100+ personal 1on1/group classes haha lol)

    14) LinkedIn Group Discussion Board Spam. “There should be more active moderation of ALL groups, such spam should be deleted, and users who abuse their membership should be blocked/banned.”
    (I seriously don't even look at Group Discussions anymore. We'll actually I pretty much blocked or took myself off almost every groups emailing list except for yours and very inactive groups.)
  • Hey Diana,

    On the people requesting Introductions, I hear' ya. Whenever someone asks me for one without any background I always send them a link to my blog post on how to ask for a LinkedIn recommendation, because so few people put much thought behind it.

    As for the Group Discussion Board spam, thanks for your comment. It is truly unfortunate. I am also guilty of not spending enough time monitoring the boards but I promise to do so when I introduce the Windmill Networking 2.0 Groups Manifesto! Stay tuned!!!
  • dianawei
    So Cal Sushi Group is probably the best Group to be a part of.....you do a great job keeping out spammers and random sale posts - only reason I'm still on the weekly list! Theres plenty of good industry content in your discussion by fans and yourself. =)

    Looking forward to Windmill Networking 2.0 Group Manifesto!!! Yah!
  • Nice posting Neal. You have done a great job of being comprehensive here. It takes a lot to add value but not as much as one would think as much of doing what is respected on the web is about promoting . . . even honoring other people who take the time to aggregate, synthesize and then showcasing the work with simple overviews of the subject matter.
  • Thank you for your comment, Melissa, and it is an honor to have your comment on my website. Networlding has been on my "To Read" list for awhile...I need to read it soon!

    And thank you for realizing my comprehensive approach. Some people have said that my blog posts are too long, but I like to put things in the proper framework and then explain in some detail so that no one needs to ask more questions about what I write. This probably explains why my book on LinkedIn is 380+ pages!

    Looking forward to your stopping by again and I look forward to connecting with you on your site as well!

    Best,
    Neal
  • Colin
    Hello,
    Re: Pet peeve #1, I just read on another reputable blog (I think it was either Blue Sky Resumes or Liz Handlin's blog). Anyway, in this posting, it encourages people to make introductions to people they don't know personally. They likened LinkedIn to a professional networking meeting. In those meetings, you basically don't know anybody, yet you try to meet as many contacts as you possibly can, hoping for some kind of a lead. I believe there could be some merit to this-- as witness the LinkedIn LION phenomenon. I'm grateful that you posted a differing perspective on this. This is why I have not invited as yet any LinkedIn LIONs to be a contact for me. I'm not sure if they will hit the dreaded IDK button.
    Colin
  • Hey Colin,

    Thanks for your comment and I am glad that you found value in my perspective.

    My Pet Peeve #1 was actually concerning LinkedIn Recommendations and people that you don't know asking for them.

    I wrote a separate blog post on LinkedIn Introductions, but I am more than happy to provide them so long as the person that I may not know asking for them gives me some background so that I can properly ask for the Introduction. It goes without saying that there has to be a valid reason and potential mutual benefit for the Introduction.

    As for inviting people into your network that you do not know, I am fully in favor of this so long as it meets your LinkedIn Objective. However, even if someone says that they are a LION it still is no guarantee that they will not respond with an IDK.

    Hope this clarifies everything!

    - Neal
  • Neal, what about passing off other peoples work as your own or attempting to drive people to your blog for no good reason...

    ...See my blog at http://www.wowtraining.co.uk to find my list of 25 linkedin etiquette tips to ponder.

    Forgive me it's Sunday afternoon and I've had too many coffees
  • Agree! It's not just the Internet marketers but also the Search Engine Optimizers who are now targeting LinkedIn users with these spammy "discussions"...
  • barbarasafani
    Neal,

    I also think the differentiation of current versus past experience is problematic, especially for people in a job search who feel like they are wearing a "Scarlet A" when they have nothing to list in the section marked current. A general experience category would be better.
  • Excellent point Barbara. Indeed, as LinkedIn's growth has been fueled by recruiters and those looking for work, it does make sense for them to better optimize their profile structure for the current economic environment. It may also help improve the quality of what the unemployed feel they have to enter as a "current" position in order to "show" something.
  • ilanjusth
    Another thing they need to add is mosr website links. I actually suggested it to them but right now you are limited to 3 links. I have a home page and so far to date 3 published articles as an IT asset manager. I use these to help in my search efforts and my only solution was to place the data in a different section and hope someone stumbles on it.
  • That's an excellent point. With so many people on Twitter, Facebook, and blogging, that there eats up all of the 3 websites we are allotted. It makes sense to increase this to 5, so you could also add your company as well as maybe a professional association. Thanks for your contribution!
  • callthatgirl
    My pet peeves:

    LINKEDIN ABUSERS
    People who connect with me to use me for introductions.
    People who ask me how to use LinkedIn constantly without thinking I should charge them


    LINKEDIN SNOBS
    People who want to connect with you furiously offline but refuse to add you LinkedIn because they "protect their contacts".


    LINKEDIN IDIOTS
    People who get bi-passed in a referral actually sending me hatemail! Please!
    People who have created an account and it's looks "Ok" then turn around and call themselves "social media guru's" and think they can now train people on how to use LinkedIn.
  • ethanbull
    All these are great tips and are actually interchange-able with other social networking sites as well. This new type of "social netowrking" communication is both useful yet fraught with new social "norms" that need to be outlined and discussed unless you want to come off looking like a jerk. Plus, if you know the "rules" prior to playing the game, you're going to get that much further ahead and get more respect if you don't. Thanks for writing this as this is one way to get that conversation started.
  • Thank you for your comment Ethan. As with everything else in social media, there are no rules because it really is one huge conversation that is taking place. It is up to us users to not only create the rules but also to try to spread them and try to enforce them. I thought that there were many excellent points to ponder from that discussion group, so I am glad that you found them to be good tips as well. And I agree that the more you understand this etiquette before embarking on your social media journey the better off you will be.
blog comments powered by Disqus