<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: What is a LinkedIn &#8220;IDK/I Don&#8217;t Know&#8221;?  And Why Should I Care?</title> <atom:link href="http://windmillnetworking.com/2008/07/11/what-is-a-linkedin-idk-i-dont-know/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://windmillnetworking.com/2008/07/11/what-is-a-linkedin-idk-i-dont-know/</link> <description>Social Media Strategy for Businesses and Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 17:57:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Can a LinkedIn LION or LinkedIn Open Networker be Selective?</title><link>http://windmillnetworking.com/2008/07/11/what-is-a-linkedin-idk-i-dont-know/#comment-4113</link> <dc:creator>Can a LinkedIn LION or LinkedIn Open Networker be Selective?</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 20:37:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://linkedinquestions.wordpress.com/?p=49#comment-4113</guid> <description>[...] there is an unwritten law that LIONs never return an invitation that they requested with an &#8220;I Don&#8217;t Know&#8221; or IDK response that would punish the sender because it is the LION that requested the invitation in the first [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there is an unwritten law that LIONs never return an invitation that they requested with an &#8220;I Don&#8217;t Know&#8221; or IDK response that would punish the sender because it is the LION that requested the invitation in the first [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The LinkedIn IDK (I Don't Know) Responses: How Many Do You Have?</title><link>http://windmillnetworking.com/2008/07/11/what-is-a-linkedin-idk-i-dont-know/#comment-3928</link> <dc:creator>The LinkedIn IDK (I Don't Know) Responses: How Many Do You Have?</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:21:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://linkedinquestions.wordpress.com/?p=49#comment-3928</guid> <description>[...] someone has sent you an &#8220;I Don&#8217;t Know&#8221; (IDK) response to your LinkedIn Invitation, it is easy to find out who did it and contact them to try to resolve it through peaceful [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] someone has sent you an &#8220;I Don&#8217;t Know&#8221; (IDK) response to your LinkedIn Invitation, it is easy to find out who did it and contact them to try to resolve it through peaceful [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: nealschaffer</title><link>http://windmillnetworking.com/2008/07/11/what-is-a-linkedin-idk-i-dont-know/#comment-3596</link> <dc:creator>nealschaffer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:29:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://linkedinquestions.wordpress.com/?p=49#comment-3596</guid> <description>I agree that there is a problem in the nomenclature.  I don&#039;t understand why LinkedIn just isn&#039;t more transparent and make it easy to accept, archive, block user, or report user for spam.  Done!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that there is a problem in the nomenclature.  I don&#39;t understand why LinkedIn just isn&#39;t more transparent and make it easy to accept, archive, block user, or report user for spam.  Done!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pantherjad</title><link>http://windmillnetworking.com/2008/07/11/what-is-a-linkedin-idk-i-dont-know/#comment-3595</link> <dc:creator>pantherjad</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:36:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://linkedinquestions.wordpress.com/?p=49#comment-3595</guid> <description>The problem is the language of the buttons, they need the following:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Accept&quot;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Do not accept&quot;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Unsolicited spam&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think most people will recognize the hard language of &quot;unsolicited spam&quot; and if you attempt to connect with them through some thin commonalities, they would merely not accept your invite. This is far better language as I think &quot;archive&quot; comes with the concept of taking up space or creating clutter and no one wants to do that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is the language of the buttons, they need the following:</p><p>&#8220;Accept&#8221;<br
/>&#8220;Do not accept&#8221;<br
/>&#8220;Unsolicited spam&#8221;</p><p>I think most people will recognize the hard language of &#8220;unsolicited spam&#8221; and if you attempt to connect with them through some thin commonalities, they would merely not accept your invite. This is far better language as I think &#8220;archive&#8221; comes with the concept of taking up space or creating clutter and no one wants to do that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: nealschaffer</title><link>http://windmillnetworking.com/2008/07/11/what-is-a-linkedin-idk-i-dont-know/#comment-903</link> <dc:creator>nealschaffer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:29:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://linkedinquestions.wordpress.com/?p=49#comment-903</guid> <description>I agree that there is a problem in the nomenclature.  I don&#039;t understand why LinkedIn just isn&#039;t more transparent and make it easy to accept, archive, block user, or report user for spam.  Done!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that there is a problem in the nomenclature.  I don&#39;t understand why LinkedIn just isn&#39;t more transparent and make it easy to accept, archive, block user, or report user for spam.  Done!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pantherjad</title><link>http://windmillnetworking.com/2008/07/11/what-is-a-linkedin-idk-i-dont-know/#comment-902</link> <dc:creator>pantherjad</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:36:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://linkedinquestions.wordpress.com/?p=49#comment-902</guid> <description>The problem is the language of the buttons, they need the following:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Accept&quot;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Do not accept&quot;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Unsolicited spam&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think most people will recognize the hard language of &quot;unsolicited spam&quot; and if you attempt to connect with them through some thin commonalities, they would merely not accept your invite. This is far better language as I think &quot;archive&quot; comes with the concept of taking up space or creating clutter and no one wants to do that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is the language of the buttons, they need the following:</p><p>&#8220;Accept&#8221;<br
/>&#8220;Do not accept&#8221;<br
/>&#8220;Unsolicited spam&#8221;</p><p>I think most people will recognize the hard language of &#8220;unsolicited spam&#8221; and if you attempt to connect with them through some thin commonalities, they would merely not accept your invite. This is far better language as I think &#8220;archive&#8221; comes with the concept of taking up space or creating clutter and no one wants to do that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Darin Allen Newberry</title><link>http://windmillnetworking.com/2008/07/11/what-is-a-linkedin-idk-i-dont-know/#comment-24</link> <dc:creator>Darin Allen Newberry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:59:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://linkedinquestions.wordpress.com/?p=49#comment-24</guid> <description>I will submit, for your consideration, that if you&#039;re just getting into this open networking arena, that you think twice about putting a little wussy statement at the bottom of your invitation, such as &quot;please don&#039;t IDK me, don&#039;t diss me, don&#039;t get me in trouble with LinkedIn, etc.&quot;
Would you put on your own résumé, &quot;may not play well with others&quot; or &quot;I love mankind, it&#039;s people that suck&quot; ???!!!
This is like a cold sales call, people, and with some of your targets, you may only have one shot to make a favorable impression. Don&#039;t waste your maximum allotted characters for your sales pitch, your request to connect, with garbage like PLEASE DON&#039;T IDK. That&#039;s so amateur, so self-defeating and so like what a &quot;script kiddie&quot; does, who doesn&#039;t have the chops, who doesn&#039;t know his programming or networking stuff. Send that boilerplate, that canned &quot;professionally written&quot; introduction from wherever you swiped it, to File 13, to your mental Trashcan, and leave it there.
[Descending from soapbox now....]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will submit, for your consideration, that if you&#8217;re just getting into this open networking arena, that you think twice about putting a little wussy statement at the bottom of your invitation, such as &#8220;please don&#8217;t IDK me, don&#8217;t diss me, don&#8217;t get me in trouble with LinkedIn, etc.&#8221;</p><p>Would you put on your own résumé, &#8220;may not play well with others&#8221; or &#8220;I love mankind, it&#8217;s people that suck&#8221; ???!!!</p><p>This is like a cold sales call, people, and with some of your targets, you may only have one shot to make a favorable impression. Don&#8217;t waste your maximum allotted characters for your sales pitch, your request to connect, with garbage like PLEASE DON&#8217;T IDK. That&#8217;s so amateur, so self-defeating and so like what a &#8220;script kiddie&#8221; does, who doesn&#8217;t have the chops, who doesn&#8217;t know his programming or networking stuff. Send that boilerplate, that canned &#8220;professionally written&#8221; introduction from wherever you swiped it, to File 13, to your mental Trashcan, and leave it there.</p><p>[Descending from soapbox now....]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Darin Allen Newberry</title><link>http://windmillnetworking.com/2008/07/11/what-is-a-linkedin-idk-i-dont-know/#comment-4255</link> <dc:creator>Darin Allen Newberry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:59:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://linkedinquestions.wordpress.com/?p=49#comment-4255</guid> <description>I will submit, for your consideration, that if you&#039;re just getting into this open networking arena, that you think twice about putting a little wussy statement at the bottom of your invitation, such as &quot;please don&#039;t IDK me, don&#039;t diss me, don&#039;t get me in trouble with LinkedIn, etc.&quot;
Would you put on your own résumé, &quot;may not play well with others&quot; or &quot;I love mankind, it&#039;s people that suck&quot; ???!!!
This is like a cold sales call, people, and with some of your targets, you may only have one shot to make a favorable impression. Don&#039;t waste your maximum allotted characters for your sales pitch, your request to connect, with garbage like PLEASE DON&#039;T IDK. That&#039;s so amateur, so self-defeating and so like what a &quot;script kiddie&quot; does, who doesn&#039;t have the chops, who doesn&#039;t know his programming or networking stuff. Send that boilerplate, that canned &quot;professionally written&quot; introduction from wherever you swiped it, to File 13, to your mental Trashcan, and leave it there.
[Descending from soapbox now....]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will submit, for your consideration, that if you&#8217;re just getting into this open networking arena, that you think twice about putting a little wussy statement at the bottom of your invitation, such as &#8220;please don&#8217;t IDK me, don&#8217;t diss me, don&#8217;t get me in trouble with LinkedIn, etc.&#8221;</p><p>Would you put on your own résumé, &#8220;may not play well with others&#8221; or &#8220;I love mankind, it&#8217;s people that suck&#8221; ???!!!</p><p>This is like a cold sales call, people, and with some of your targets, you may only have one shot to make a favorable impression. Don&#8217;t waste your maximum allotted characters for your sales pitch, your request to connect, with garbage like PLEASE DON&#8217;T IDK. That&#8217;s so amateur, so self-defeating and so like what a &#8220;script kiddie&#8221; does, who doesn&#8217;t have the chops, who doesn&#8217;t know his programming or networking stuff. Send that boilerplate, that canned &#8220;professionally written&#8221; introduction from wherever you swiped it, to File 13, to your mental Trashcan, and leave it there.</p><p>[Descending from soapbox now....]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
